Legal Opinion
United States v. Gissel
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided January 19, 1973No. Civ. A. 70-H-542, 70-H-543PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CARL O. BUE, Jr., District Judge.
In these .consolidated actions the United States, as obligee, seeks to recover on two $10,000 bonds which it is asserted guaranteed the payment of certain customs duties previously assessed against the vessel SS SEA PIONEER pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 257 as a result of foreign vessel repairs. The defendants are (1) the principals on the bonds, who are also the local berth or husbanding agents for the same vessel and its owner on separate occasions, and (2) the sureties on said bonds. The parties have stipulated the facts and, therefore, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Estate of Sanford v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Lewis v. East Texas Finance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
- Max Stool v. J. C. Penney Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Dietrich v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Instone Travel Tech Marine & Offshore v. International Shipping Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Texaco Marine Services, Inc. And Texaco Refining and Marketing, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Erie Navigation Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
- Mount Washington Tanker Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Mount Washington Tanker Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.