Legal Opinion

Georgia Marble Co. v. Whitlock

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 5, 1990No. S90A0316PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

This appeal concerns, inter alia, the constitutionality of Georgia’s statute for the lapse of mineral interests or rights, OCGA § 44-5-168, and whether defendant-appellant Georgia Marble Company has failed to pay taxes due on the mineral interest that is the subject of this litigation and thus has lost that mineral interest under § 44-5-168. The trial court held the statute constitutional and ruled that Georgia Marble had lost its mineral interest. We affirm.

Plaintiffs-appellees, Cecil and Coleen Whitlock, are the fee owners of approximately 120 acres in the eastern portion of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Hayes v. HowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  3. Dubbers-Albrecht v. NathanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  4. Hinson v. LoperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Muskin v. State Department of Assessments & TaxationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. State v. LevinerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Legum v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. Samay v. SomCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  5. Georgia Public Service Commission v. Alltel Georgia Communications Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API