Wood v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BARROW, J.
In this appeal of an extortion conviction, we conclude that the Commonwealth was not required to prove the falsity of an allegation underlying a threat to injure a victim’s character. The crime of extortion addresses the malice found in obtaining money or other value by threatening to harm another’s character; it is not concerned with whether the accusation, by which the harm is threatened, is true or false.
At trial there was evidence that the defendant attempted to extort money from Kubacki by threatening to claim that he had raped her if he did not give her the money she…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Higginbotham v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
- Boyle v. LandrySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Landry v. DaleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1968
- Eacock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Russo v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Daung Sam v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
- Daye v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
- Phillips v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Vanegas v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
- Neelab Hashimi Ahmadzi v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.