Legal Opinion

Phillips v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 2005No. 42177PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court, Becker, C. J.:

In this appeal, we consider the meaning of the terms “libel,” “disgrace” and “secret” as used in Nevada’s extortion statute, NRS 205.320. We conclude that “libel” refers to the publication of a false statement of fact, “disgrace” means to humiliate or cause loss of favor or standing, and “secret” means a fact that is unfavorable to the interest of a person and unknown to the public and that a person would wish to conceal.

Because the district court failed to properly instruct the jury about the elements of extortion, resulting in a verdict based on a legally…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cortinas v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Bolden v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Fields v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Fields v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Phillips v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API