Legal Opinion

Russo v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 13, 1966No. Record 6125PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

The defendant, Albert J. Russo, a medical doctor, was indicted for abortion performed on Phyllis Gaskins, in violation of § 18.1-62 of the Code. * A jury found him guilty as charged, fixed his punishment at five years in the penitentiary, and sentence was pronounced on him in accordance with the verdict.

On this appeal from the judgment of conviction, and under his assignments of error, the defendant contends that the “medical evidence” of induced abortion was not sufficient to support the verdict; that counsel for the Commonwealth made improper and prejudicial arguments; that inadmissible…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wright v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  2. State v. CirulloWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Crisman v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1955
  4. Cochran v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
  5. Gall v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Spencer v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  2. Stockton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  3. Cheng v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  4. Porter v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  5. Whitley v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API