Ellerbeck v. Continental Casualty Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGideon, J.
This action was instituted upon a policy of accident and *532health, insurance issued to plaintiff by the defendant company. Plaintiff had judgment. Motion for new trial was denied. Defendant appeals.
The complaint alleges that in October, 1920, defendant issued to plaintiff a certain accident and health insurance policy. A copy of the policy is attached to the complaint. It is alleged that the first yearly premium was paid by plaintiff and accepted by defendant; that prior to October 8, 1921, defendant issued a certificate renewing the policy for a period of one year to October 8, 1922; that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Insurance Co. v. WolffSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Dromgold v. Royal Neighbors of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
- Loftis v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceUtah Supreme Court · 1911
- Aetna Life Insurance v. FallowTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cruz v. MontoyaUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Jones v. New York Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1926
- Redeman v. Preferred Accident InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Sullivan v. Beneficial Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
- Ballard v. Beneficial Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.