Legal Opinion

Ellerbeck v. Continental Casualty Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1924No. 4114PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGideon, J.

This action was instituted upon a policy of accident and *532health, insurance issued to plaintiff by the defendant company. Plaintiff had judgment. Motion for new trial was denied. Defendant appeals.

The complaint alleges that in October, 1920, defendant issued to plaintiff a certain accident and health insurance policy. A copy of the policy is attached to the complaint. It is alleged that the first yearly premium was paid by plaintiff and accepted by defendant; that prior to October 8, 1921, defendant issued a certificate renewing the policy for a period of one year to October 8, 1922; that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Insurance Co. v. WolffSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Dromgold v. Royal Neighbors of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Loftis v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Aetna Life Insurance v. FallowTennessee Supreme Court · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cruz v. MontoyaUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Jones v. New York Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Redeman v. Preferred Accident InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Sullivan v. Beneficial Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Ballard v. Beneficial Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API