Brisendine v. Hunt
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.
James M. Brisendine brought his action for damages against Dr. Kenneth S. Hunt, a practicing physician and surgeon, for malpractice. The trial resulted in a verdict for the defendant; the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was overruled and the movant excepted.
There being no demurrer in the case, it is deemed sufficient for the purposes of this decision to state somewhat generally the allegations of the petition. It alleges that in operating for hemorrhoids on April 25, 1928, the defendant negligently “cut, ruptured, and severed the sphincter ani muscle in petitioner’s body;” that when the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- O'Dell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. McKinneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Tanner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Jones v. McElroySupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Smith v. OverbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sandford v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Hopper v. McCordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Minter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Queen v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Albright v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.