Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Disciplinary Counsel v. Stafford

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 2012No. 2011-0408Published

1ConcurrenceO’Donnell, J.

{¶ 81} I concur with the majority in this case but write separately to address an assertion presented by respondent’s counsel during oral argument regarding ex parte communications occurring in the Domestic Relations Division of the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court. The following colloquy occurred during oral argument regarding respondent’s conduct in obtaining an ex parte order granting leave to amend a pleading in a case pending in that court:

Justice Lundberg Stratton: What about the allegations that [Stafford] continued to obtain ex parte amendments and — and—such without fully…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. StuardOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. MedleyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BaumgartnerOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Stark County Bar Ass'n v. ArrowOhio Supreme Court · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API