District of Columbia v. Aetna Insurance
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PRYOR, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal from a grant of summary judgment in favor of Aetna Insurance Company (Aetna), the surety under a construction contract involving the District of Columbia. There being no factual issues alleged, our review is limited to whether, as a matter of law, a performance bond surety for one of two public works projects involving the same contractor, upon default of the contractor on one job and full performance by the surety, is subrogated to the rights and remedies against the contractor that the District would have had if it had completed the project itself.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pearlman v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Memphis & Little Rock Railroad v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Gratiot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
- American Surety Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mon-Ray, Inc. v. Granite Re, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Nelson Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Curtis v. GordonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Transamerica Insurance Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- First Maryland Financial Services Corp. v. District-Realty Title Insurance Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.