Legal Opinion
Pergament v. Frazer
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 12, 1949No. 7354PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICARD, District Judge.
Defendants, United States of America, Reconstruction Finance Corporation, “Metals,” and “Products” respectively move to dismiss the above action as against each of them for the reasons announced in this memorandum and order. This court believes that the extensive briefs filed by “Metals,” “Products” and plaintiffs so completely cover the issues that we deem it unnecessary needlessly to add to the task of the courts to which this matter may eventually be appealed by writing an extensive opinion.
1. As to Motion to Dismiss by United States of America.
The court grants this…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Peterson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ruby Velandra and Roy Velandra v. Regie Nationale Des Usines Renault and Renault, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- DeHaas v. Empire Petroleum CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1968
- Elster v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
- Empire Steel Corp. of Texas, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Fisher v. First National Bank of OmahaDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.