Legal Opinion

State v. Cullen

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 10, 2003No. 87,853PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J.:

Matthew J. Cullen pled guilty to attempted rape and received an upward durational departure sentence and an extended postrelease supervision term. He appeals his sentence.

The two questions for review are: (1) Is Cullen’s upward durational departure sentence imposed under K.S.A. 2001 Supp. 21-4716 unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 147 L. Ed. 2d 435, 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000), and State v. Gould, 271 Kan. 394, 23 P.3d 801 (2001), even though Cullen, in a plea agreement, recommended that the trial court impose an upward…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. State v. GouldSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. People v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. DukeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  5. State v. StarksCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. QuestedSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. State v. BoleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  4. State v. HuffSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  5. State v. GaydenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API