Legal Opinion

Strumskis v. Tilenas

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 2, 1929PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

This is a bill for specific performance of a written agreement for an exchange of mortgaged real estate signed by the parties on August 15, and to be performed by them on August 23, 1927, through the exchange *552of deeds of conveyance and payment of the difference in the agreed values of the equities in cash by the defendant to the plaintiff. The defendant within two or three days after August 15, gave notice that she would not carry out the agreement and refused to go on with the transaction. The bill was filed on August 24, 1927, and alleges that the plaintiff “at all times was and is ready,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Corkum v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  2. First African Methodist Episcopal Society v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Thaxter v. SpragueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  4. Volpe v. SensatiniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Hazen v. WarwickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Board of Assessors v. Suffolk Law SchoolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Hunt v. BassettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Limpus v. ArmstrongMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  4. New England Trust Co. v. SpauldingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Morad v. SilvaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API