Legal Opinion

Thaxter v. Sprague

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 21, 1893PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

This is a bill for specific performance, filed on March 26,1888. The plaintiff is not entitled as a matter of strict right to the relief which she seeks. The application is addressed to the discretion of the court, which, in considering it, will take into account all the circumstances. Lee v. Kirby, 104 Mass. 420. Curran v. Holyoke Water Power Co. 116 Mass. 90. Wonson v. Fenno, 129 Mass. 405. Western Railroad v. Babcock, 6 Met. 346, 352. The contract on which the plaintiff relies was dated April 26, 1887, and provided for the payment of $50 down by her and $25 per month till the amount of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Curran v. Holyoke Water Power Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  2. Gannett v. AlbreeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. Lee v. KirbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Wonson v. FennoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Dickson v. StricklandTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Institution for Savings in Newburyport & Its Vicinity v. PufferMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Albert E. Touchet, Inc. v. TouchetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. O'Brien v. BolandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  5. Revere Water Co. v. Inhabitants of WinthropMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API