Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Pierson v. O'Connor

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1891PublishedCited by 12 opinions

On quo warranto. On demurrer to information. The facts appear fully in the opinion of the court. Argued at June Term, 1891, before' Beasley, Chief Justice, and Justices Van Syckel, Knapp and Garrison.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Knapp, J.

The relator was appointed to and served in the office of clerk of the First District Court in the city of Newark. When the judge who appointed- him went out of office and was succeeded by the present incumbent, the defendant was chosen by the present judge of that court to the office of clerk, and is, after due installment, p'erforming'its duties.

The act constituting District Courts in the city of Newark (Pamph. L. 1873,p. 246) provides that “the clerk of each of said courts shall be appointed by the judge thereof,- and shall hold his office…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Lewis v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Governmental Research Bureau, Inc. v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Miele v. McGuireSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Falcey v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  4. Paddock v. Hudson County Board of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  5. State v. PostSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API