Holl v. U.S. Dist. Court for the N. Dist. of Cal.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HAWKINS, Senior Circuit Judge:
*1079This case tests the outer limits of what constitutes a "reasonably conspicuous" provision as part of the terms of usage so prevalent in the adhesion contracts of modern internet commerce. Here, Randall Holl employs the extraordinary writ of mandamus to test the district court's conclusion that United Parcel Service, Inc.'s ("UPS's") arbitration provision passed muster. Viewing Holl's challenge through the lens of the strict requirements of Bauman v. United States District Court , 557 F.2d 650, 654-55 (9th Cir. 1977), we deny the writ, noting that UPS has since…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Meyer v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Holly W. BAUMAN Et Al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Respondent, Union Oil Company, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Kevin Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Sean Wilson v. Huuuge, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Associated Physicians of Dearborn, PLLC v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- B.D. v. Blizzard EntertainmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Baker v. Weststar Credit UnionDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022
- Bender v. Twilio Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.