Legal Opinion

Collette v. Matejcek

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1966No. 8241PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTeigen, Chief Justice

(on reassignment).

The plaintiffs have appealed from an order denying application for relief by writ of prohibition and modification of the temporary restraining order.

It appears the board of county commissioners of Walsh County, North Dakota, after notification by the county superintendent of schools, instituted a proceeding to dissolve Oakwood School District # 21, and attach it to an adjoining school district under the provisions of Section 15-22-21, N.D.C.C., as amended by Chapter 157, Session Laws of 1961. The pertinent parts of this statute provided:

When the county superintendent of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Leu v. MontgomeryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Wilson v. KrygerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Mevorah v. GoodmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  5. First National Bank v. BremsethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Parker Hotel Company v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Shenfield v. City Court of City of Tucson, Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  3. Trengen v. MongeonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Tsipai v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  5. Buchmann v. BuchmannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API