Legal Opinion

Farrell v. Spangle

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 22, 1964PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment rendered by the Court of Common Pleas in favor of the defendant in an action to enjoin him from maintaining a mooring for his tugboat in Nor-*710walk harbor. The plaintiffs claim that certain legal conclusions on which the court based its decision were, as applied to the facts of this ease, erroneous.

The plaintiffs did not file either a request for a finding or a draft finding. Consequently no finding was made. A finding is neeessary where error is claimed in conclusions of law or fact that do not appear on the face of the record. Practice Book, 1963,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mendrochowicz v. WolfeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  2. Gitlitz v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  3. Tuite v. TuiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  4. Burma Development Corp. v. SanfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. LenczykSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  2. Kyser v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  3. Wagner v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  4. Keane v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  5. Lomas & Nettleton Co. v. CadouxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API