Legal Opinion

Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Voigt

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1934PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The first and second causes of action are to recover from Emma Voigt $1,689.58 and $6,045.68, respectively, which were withdrawn by her in January and February, 1929, from the First Wisconsin National Bank, with which they were on deposit in two savings accounts in the names of “Herman or Emma Voigt.” Emma Voigt was the surviving wife of Herman Voigt, deceased. He had opened the first account on July 16, 1926, by a deposit of $500 of his money, which at his direction was entered in a *29pass-book delivered to him by the bank. The second account was opened by him on July 20, 1927, when he…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Beaver v. . BeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Chippendale v. North Adams Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Cleveland Trust Co. v. ScobieOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Battles v. Millbury Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Roseliep v. HerroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Estate of Staver v. StaverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Sinift v. SiniftSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  3. Culligan, Inc. v. RheaumeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. DeLong v. Farmers Building and Loan AssociationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Plainse v. EngleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API