Legal Opinion

Gross v. Herb Lungren Chevrolet, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 23, 1976No. 48,259PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Miller, J.:

This is a workmen’s compensation proceeding. The claimant, Jacob A. Gross, sustained a “scheduled” injury, a permanent partial loss of the use of his left lower leg, during the course of his employment as a mechanic for Lungren Chevrolet. From an award basing his compensation on a 20% loss of use of the lower leg, he appeals, contending that the award is improperly based on functional rather than work disability.

The issue before us is the meaning of “loss of the use,” as that phrase is used in K. S. A. 44-510d (21), now K. S. A. 1975 Supp.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Puckett v. C. K. Minter Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. Gray v. A. L. Beller & Home Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  3. Davis v. Winchester Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. Mooney v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  5. Smythe v. Western Star Milling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Kinsley Sand & Gravel, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Duncan v. City of Osage CityCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
  3. Fogle v. Sedgwick CountyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1983
  4. Schubert v. Peerless Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  5. Quinones v. MBPXL CORP.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API