Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Twine

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 10, 2003No. 2-02-360-CRPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAM J. DAY, Justice.

Appellant Gary Matthew Twine appeals the trial court’s denial of his application for habeas corpus relief based on the ground of double jeopardy. In two points, Appellant alleges that: 1) the trial court erred in denying the application for writ of habeas corpus because of the State’s introduction of evidence of Appellant’s post-arrest silence; and 2) the trial court erred in excluding evidence from a previous trial where the same prosecutor had previously provoked a mistrial based on evidence of a defendant’s post-arrest silence. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Appellant…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Weatherred v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Bauder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Mello, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
  2. Ex Parte WheelerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  3. Arnaldo Ortiz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
  4. Candace Nichole Terrell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
  5. Candace Nichole Terrell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API