Glass Service Co. v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co.

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Appellant Progressive Insurance Company argues that the trial court erred in interpreting appellant’s insurance policy, having improperly substituted language from the Unfair Claims Practices Act (UCPA) in place of insurance policy language. We affirm.

FACTS

Under its automobile insurance policy, appellant Progressive Insurance Company provides coverage for windshield glass. 1 Respondent Glass Service Company is a Minnesota business that has provided auto glass replacement services to auto owners, including some of those insured by appellant. Respondent received an…