Legal Opinion

Kautzman v. Kautzman

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 2003No. 20030038PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Robert A. Kautzman (“Kautz-man”) appealed a bench warrant and an order dated January 16, 2003, denying his motions to vacate the bench warrant and to determine that Rachel M. Kautzman, n/k/a Rachel M. Dietz (“Dietz”) has no right to enforce her equitable liens three years after judgment. We affirm and remand for a determination on Dietz’s request for attorney fees.

I

[¶ 2] This is the sixth appeal 1 arising out of a 1995 divorce action. See Kautzman v. Kautzman, 2002 ND 118, 647 N.W.2d 684 (“Kautzman IV”); Kautzman v. Kautzman, 2000 ND 190, 618 N.W.2d 500 (“Kautzman III”)]…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Kautzman v. KautzmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Olander Contracting Co. v. Gail Wachter InvestmentsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. MotskoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. TriebNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. City of Wahpeton v. Drake-Henne, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Riemers v. Grand Forks HeraldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Riemers v. O'HALLORANNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Hale v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Dietz v. KautzmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Oldham v. OldhamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API