Commonwealth v. Columbia Investment Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts,
The Commonwealth appeals from an order of the Superior Court that affirmed the trial court’s quashing of indictments against appellees Columbia Investment Corporation, and two of its officers Herbert Burstein, and Jack Shapiro. The Superior Court held that appellees were “in the status of accused persons” when called to testify before an investigating grand jury. Therefore, according to the Superior Court, appellees were entitled to be warned that wMle before the grand jury they had the unqualified right to remain silent; that anytMng they said would be used…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WeitkampSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Levy v. Senate of PennsylvaniaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Woods v. DunlopSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.