State v. Taylor

Concurring & Dissenting Opinion by

ACOBA, J.

I respectfully dissent1 in that the evidence presented to the grand jury was insufficient to indict Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Daniel Taylor (Petitioner) for theft in the first degree, Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) *225§§ 708-830(1) (1993)2 and 708-830.5(l)(a) (1993),3 and the evidence that was presented was seemingly misleading. Accordingly, I would reverse the March 16, 2011 judgment of the Intel-mediate Court of Appeals (ICA), and the November 14, 2007 findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order denying Petitioner’s motion to dismiss the…