Legal Opinion

Lane v. MIMS

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 28, 1952No. 16607PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eishburne, Justice.

The plaintiff (appellant here) brought this action against the defendants alleging that he is the owner and in possession of a tract of land containing 547 acres, more or less, situate in Williamsburg County, and that the defendants were trespassing thereon and interfering with his peaceable possession. He alleged irreparable damage and prayed for an injunction.

By their answer, the defendants raised an issue of title to a portion of the above-mentioned tract of land, comprising about 100 acres; denied that they'were trespassing upon lands of the plaintiff, and alleged that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Beaufort Land & Investment Co. v. New River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  2. Marks v. I. M. Pearlstine & SonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  3. Connor v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
  4. Vance v. FergusonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
  5. Arkwright Mills v. Clearwater Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ravan v. Greenville CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Charleston Joint Venture v. McPhersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Hoogenboom v. City of BeaufortCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Daniels v. ColemanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  5. Johnson v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API