Johnson v. Phillips
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Judge:
This is a dispute between adjacent landowners over the diversion of surface water caused by the development of a residential subdivision. Donald E. Smith and Mary S. Mercer, 1 tenants in common of a tract of land in the City of Rock Hill known as the Royal Oaks Subdivision, sued Robert B. Phillips, Andrew F. Phillips, and Opal B. Phillips, tenants in common of the tract bordering Royal Oaks on the south. The complaint alleged causes of action for interference with a prescriptive easement, private nuisance, and trespass. It sought both injunctive relief and actual and punitive…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Malmberg v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Swift v. BroylesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Snow v. City of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
- Sullivan v. Old Colony Street RailwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Gwathmey v. Foor Hotel CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Vinson v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Lucas v. RAWL FAMILY LTD. PARTNERSHIPSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- Stephens v. DraffinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Stevens v. AllenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.