Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Collett v. Truax
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 15, 1927No. 20392PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
This application for a peremptory writ of mandamus arises under Section 1436 of the General Code, the pertinent portions of which are as follows:
“It shall be lawful for any citizen of the state of Ohio to engage in the business of raising and selling domesticated English ringneck or Mongolian or Chinese pheasant, mallard or black ducks, on the lands on which he is the owner or lessee. Any citizen desiring to engage in the propagation of the birds herein mentioned, shall make application in writing to the secretary of agriculture for a permit, and when it shall appear that such apjjlication is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- New York Ex Rel. Silz v. HesterbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Ward v. Race HorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Ex parte MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Howell v. SchieleOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Ohio Division of Wildlife v. CliftonPickaway County Court of Common Pleas · 1997