Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Howell v. Schiele

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1950No. 31917PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The pertinent part of Section 722-2 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Cincinnati reads:

“Any responsible person or firm may obtain from the city treasurer, a license to do business as a professional bondsman on payment of an annual license fee of one hundred dollars * * (Emphasis added.)

Section 722-2a of the code of ordinances requires an applicant for such license to furnish with the application a surety bond in favor of the city of Cincinnati in any sum, not less than $1,000, adequate to cover at all times the total amount of all outstanding, undischarged bail bonds,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Collett v. TruaxOhio Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HughesOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. American Bail Bond AgencyOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Summit Fidelity & Surety Co. of Akron, Ohio v. NimtzNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  4. State v. StevensOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State, Ex Rel. Paul Stutler, Inc. v. YacobucciOhio Court of Appeals · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API