Legal Opinion

Estes v. Estes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 16, 1996No. 86335PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Justice.

The issues in this case are (1) whether interdocket boundaries prohibited the district court from exercising authority 1 over an action to decide title to property omitted from an inventory and distribution in a probate but claimed to be exempt from the probate estate, and (2) if not, whether the district court erred in granting defendant’s motion to dismiss. We answer that interdocket boundaries did not preclude the district court from exercising authority over the matter and that the district court erred in granting the motion to dismiss.

I. FACTS

This dispute arises over…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Frazier v. Bryan Memorial Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Hayes v. Eateries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Wilson v. KaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Chouteau v. ChouteauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Records v. MilesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wright v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. Boren v. Thompson & AssociatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. CARISTA v. VALUCKCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
  4. Pollock v. Phillips (In re Phillips)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2014
  5. Young v. CHESAPEAKE LAND COMPANY, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API