Legal Opinion

People v. Pitcock

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 26, 1982No. Crim. 11617PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REGAN, Acting P. J.

Defendant was convicted by jury of an attempted escape from Deuel Vocational Institution, in violation of Penal Code section 2042. He was sentenced to the middle term of two years to be served consecutively to the prison term he was serving when he attempted to escape. The two-year sentence was based on the punishment prescribed by Penal Code section 18 for a violation of Penal Code section 2042. The consecutive application of the term was based on (1) the well-planned and sophisticated plan of escape as opposed to a spontaneous act, and (2) defendant’s very poor…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. DuranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. RistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. LovercampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. People v. GiminezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. ValenzuelaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. People v. NickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. People v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. People v. HoldsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. People v. LamontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API