Legal Opinion

Yancey v. Denham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 17, 1924No. 8 Div. 597PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBduldin, J.

The complaint is on three promissory notes in separate counts.

The defendants interposed several pleas of res adjudicata setting up, in substance, that the notes were given in one transaction, and represented 'installments of purchase money for a horse; that embodied in the notes was a mortgage on the horse sold and another horse as security for the debt; that after the maturity of the first note this same plaintiff sued these same defendants in a court of competent jurisdiction, joining a count in detinue and a count in assumpsit, both founded on the first maturing mortgage note; and that' in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strauss v. MeertiefSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Terrell v. NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. McCall v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  4. Glasser, Kuder & Ottensosser v. MeyrovitzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  5. Peoples Shoe Co. v. SkallySupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Britling Cafeteria Co. v. IrwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Royal Indemnity Company v. PearsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  4. Cook v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  5. Commercial Credit Co. v. ParksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API