Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Southern California Rapid Transit District

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 11, 1993No. B059838PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NOTT, J.

Appellant Elizabeth Schmidt appeals from a judgment entered against her following the grant of a motion by respondent Southern California Rapid Transit District for judgment on the pleadings.

In a twist from the usual circumstance, this case involves a situation in which appellant complied with the filing deadlines requisite in making a claim against respondent, but did not file suit within one year of the injury.

The issue to be resolved is whether, in a claim against a public entity for personal injuries (not involving negligence of a health care provider), a claimant is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Fuentes v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Young v. HainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Lazar v. Hertz Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Petaluma City School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1993
  3. City of Santa Monica v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Larson v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Arthur Andersen LLP v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API