Schmidt v. Southern California Rapid Transit District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NOTT, J.
Appellant Elizabeth Schmidt appeals from a judgment entered against her following the grant of a motion by respondent Southern California Rapid Transit District for judgment on the pleadings.
In a twist from the usual circumstance, this case involves a situation in which appellant complied with the filing deadlines requisite in making a claim against respondent, but did not file suit within one year of the injury.
The issue to be resolved is whether, in a claim against a public entity for personal injuries (not involving negligence of a health care provider), a claimant is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Fuentes v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Young v. HainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Lazar v. Hertz Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Petaluma City School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1993
- City of Santa Monica v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Larson v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.