Broadway Laundry Co. v. Strauss

OPINION

By KRAMER, J.

Yaro Strauss, the defendant, was employed by the plaintiff as a driver to cover an established route of that company and continued in that employment for several years. In October, 1934, Strauss informed plaintiff that he could not continue in its ernploy at the salary to which he had been reduced and frankly declared that it was his intention to engage in the laundry business for himself and to call upon the customers of plaintiff who were upon his route to solicit their patronage.

There are these additional facts, which, in the court’s opinion are material to the…