Legal Opinion
D'Agostino v. Delgadillo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 1, 2004No. 04-55291; D.C. No. CV-04-00878-WJRPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
Lea Purwin D’Agostino appeals the district court’s Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arising out of the April 10, 2001 primary election for the position of Los Angeles City Attorney. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and review de novo a district court’s Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Libas Ltd. v. Carillo, 329 F.3d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.2003). We agree with the district court that D’Agostino cannot state a procedural due process claim because: (1) she has no property interest as a candidate…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Sheldon Portman v. County of Santa Clara Bob DiridonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Handy v. Lane CountyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- Khan v. City of Lodi, CADistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023