Legal Opinion
Handy v. Lane County
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided March 26, 2013No. Case No. 6:12-cv-01548-AAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
AIKEN, Chief Judge:
Defendants Lane County (“County”), Liane Richardson, Jay Bozievich, Sidney Leiken, and Faye Stewart move to dismiss plaintiffs Rob Handy’s and Brian McCall’s claims pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and Fed.R.Civ.P. Í2(b)(6). For the rea*1300sons set forth below, defendants’ motion is granted and this case is dismissed.
BACKGROUND
Prior to the initiation of this lawsuit, plaintiff Handy, and defendants Bozievich, Leiken, and Stewart served as duly elected members of the County Board of Commissioners (“Board”). The Board is a five-member governing body1 duly…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Berger v. New Hanover Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rsNorth Carolina Business Court · 2013