Legal Opinion
Orloff v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 23, 2003No. 02-1189PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.
RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge:
In order to gain new business in the Cleveland, Ohio, area, Verizon Wireless negotiated with prospective customers and offered them special deals. Jacqueline Or-loff, a former Verizon customer, filed a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission, claiming that Verizon’s practice of granting “sales concessions” violated the non-discrimination clause of 47 U.S.C. § 202(a) and Verizon’s duty as a common carrier. Her petition for judicial review challenges the Commission’s determination that Verizon’s granting…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Federal Communications Commission v. Midwest Video Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Verizon v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- City of Arlington v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Alliance for Community Media v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Cellco Partnership v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- In Re Universal Service Fund Telephone BillingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.