Legal Opinion
Verizon v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 14, 2014No. 11-1355, 11-1356PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.
Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Senior Circuit Judge SILBERMAN. TATEL, Circuit Judge.
For the second time in four years, we are confronted with a Federal Communications Commission effort to compel broadband providers to treat all Internet traffic the same regardless of source — or to require, as it is popularly known, “net neutrality.” In Comcast Corp. v. FCC, 600 F.3d 642 (D.C.Cir.2010), we held that the Commission had failed to cite any statutory authority that would justify its order compelling a broadband…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. United States Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States Telecom Ass'n v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Clean Air Council v. E. Scott PruittCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- American Wild Horse Preservation Campaign v. Sonny PerdueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Van Hollen v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.