Legal Opinion
Brumley v. Pfizer, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided June 7, 2001No. CIV. A. C-00-160PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER CONCERNING ADMISSIBILITY OF EXPERT WITNESS OPINIONS
JACK, District Judge.
On May 14, 2001, the Court heard evidence and argument concerning the Defendant’s motion to exclude testimony by the Plaintiffs experts. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Pfizer’s motion to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Gerald Polukoff to the extent the testimony goes beyond the opinions stated in his Rule 26 report. The Court also GRANTS Pfizer’s unopposed motion to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Sanjay Kaul.
I. JURISDICTION
The Court has diversity jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Commercial Data Servers, Inc. v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Pritchard v. Dow Argo SciencesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Suzlon Wind Energy Corporation v. Shippers Stevedoring CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- Newton v. Roche Laboratories, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2002
- Meinelt v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.