Legal Opinion
Tinker v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 26, 1935No. 2469PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By STEVENS, J.
Article II, §35, of the Constitution of Ohio, provides:
“For the purpose of providing compensation to workmen and their dependents, for death, injuries or occupational disease, occasioned in the course of such workmen’s employment, laws may be passed * *
Sec 1465-68, GC, passed in pursuance of the above constitutional authority, provides:
“Every employe * * * who is injured "• * * in the course of employment, wheresoever such injury has occurred, provided the same was not purposely self-inflicted, * * * shall be entitled to receive * * * sucli compensation * * * as provided…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of Heitz v. . RuppertNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Vennen v. New Dells Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by5 opinions
- Industrial Commission v. LugerOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
- White v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
- Murphy v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
- Nelson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
- Matezak v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1940