Legal Opinion

Tinker v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1935No. 2469PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By STEVENS, J.

Article II, §35, of the Constitution of Ohio, provides:

“For the purpose of providing compensation to workmen and their dependents, for death, injuries or occupational disease, occasioned in the course of such workmen’s employment, laws may be passed * *

Sec 1465-68, GC, passed in pursuance of the above constitutional authority, provides:

“Every employe * * * who is injured "• * * in the course of employment, wheresoever such injury has occurred, provided the same was not purposely self-inflicted, * * * shall be entitled to receive * * * sucli compensation * * * as provided…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Heitz v. . RuppertNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Vennen v. New Dells Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. LugerOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. White v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Murphy v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Nelson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. Matezak v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API