Legal Opinion

Matezak v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1940No. 3320Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The Industrial Commission of Ohio having, upon rehearing, denied the plaintiff (appellee) the right to participate in the Workmen’s Compensation fund, appeal to the Court of Common Pleas from that order was duly perfected. Trial to a jury in the Court of Common Pleas of Summit county resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff (appellee), and the matter is now before this court as an appeal on questions of law.

The record discloses these facts:

*642That plaintiff, Nick Matezak, while an employee of the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., was working at his regular employment in the…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tinker v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API