Legal Opinion

Community State Bank v. Martin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1927No. 20281. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

As to the defendants Jacob Martin and wife, this action was brought to foreclose a chattel mortgage. As to the other defendants, damages were sought because they had purchased certain property claimed to have been covered by the mortgage and had failed to account to the plaintiff for the purchase price. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence, the defendants, other than Martin and wife, challenged the sufficiency thereof and moved for a dismissal. This motion was granted. Judgment was entered against Martin and wife for the sum of $772.44 together with interest thereon, which was the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. New Orleans RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Richardson v. Washington & Costley Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Stickney v. Dunaway & LambertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Windham & Co. v. Stephenson & AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  5. Paden & Co. v. Bellenger & RallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fisher v. ThumlertWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. MacKall-paine Veneer Co. v. Vancouver Plywood Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Simons v. Lee James Finance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co. v. Fruit Production Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Robson v. MaloneyWashington Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API