Legal Opinion

State v. Barber

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 27, 2002No. 00C42159; A111533PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

The state appeals a pretrial order granting defendant’s motion to suppress statements made following a waiver of Miranda rights on the ground that defendant failed “intelligently” to waive those rights. We reverse and remand.

The following facts are not in dispute. Marion County Sheriffs Deputy Nicoloff received a report from a 14-year-old girl that she and defendant, her 19-year-old boyfriend, had engaged in sexual intercourse. Nicoloff called defendant on the telephone and asked him to come to the police station to talk. Defendant agreed to meet at the station later that day.

Defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WerowinskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. State v. ClemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. State v. HickamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BushCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. State v. GrimmCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. State v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API