Legal Opinion

State v. Shirley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 2, 2008No. 051237398; A132681PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P.J.

Defendant appeals a conviction for possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.840(3). On appeal, he makes two assignments of error. In his first assignment of error, he asserts that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress statements he made after being stopped by a Portland police officer. In his second assignment of error, he asserts that the trial court erred in admitting a laboratory report showing that the substance he possessed was cocaine. With regard to the second assignment of error, the state concedes that error apparent on the face of the record exists under State…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. Roble-BakerOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. MageeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. WerowinskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. State v. MarroquinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HendonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API