Legal Opinion

Lauro v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 5, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brandveen, J), dated May 20, 2003, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint for failure to comply with General Municipal Law § 50-e (2).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The notice of claim did not comply with General Municipal Law § 50-e (2), because it failed to identify the location of the accident with sufficient particularity to enable the defendant to locate the alleged defect, conduct a meaningful…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Yankana v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Richard v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Ames v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Light v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Edgehill v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Charleston v. Incorporated VillageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API