Legal Opinion
Charleston v. Incorporated Village
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 5, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the de*642fendant Incorporated Village of Cedarhurst appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Woodard, J.), dated June 24, 2008, as granted that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (6) for leave to amend the notice of claim and denied its cross motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it on the ground that the notice of claim was defective.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the facts and in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Caselli v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Yankana v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Richard v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Jones v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Austin v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Torres v. Town of BabylonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Murtha v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Bottini v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010