Legal Opinion

State v. Briggen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The defendant challenges the validity of the indictment by objecting to the state’s testimony. The accusation made by the grand jury reads:

“The said H. E. Briggen, on the 8th day of January, A. D., 1923, in the said county of Harney, state of Oregon, then and there being, did then and there wrongfully, unlawfully, feloniously, and burglariously break and enter a building, to wit: a warehouse in which property was then and there kept, with the intent to- steal therein, and did then and there wrongfully, unlawfully, feloniously, and burglariously take, steal, and carry away therein and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. Foot YouOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Giachetta v. MarquamOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  3. State v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  4. State v. TamlerOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  5. State v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1900

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mead v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. CouchOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Lilly v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. State v. NascimentoOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. ElkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API