Legal Opinion

State v. Robinson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1897PublishedCited by 45 opinions

From Marion: George H. Burnett, Judge. Andrew Robinson having been convicted of the crime of rape on a child under the age of consent, appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

The defendant was indicted for and convicted of the crime of rape by carnally knowing a female child under the age of sixteen years, and, having been sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary, brings this appeal to reverse the judgment. The conviction was had under the act of 1895 (Laws 1895, p. 67) entitled “An act entitled an act to amend section 1733 of chapter XI of title XI of the Criminal Code of Oregon, as compiled and annotated by William Lair Hill, ” and is as follows: “Be it enacted by the legislative assembly of the State of Oregon : Section 1733. If any person over the age of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. . O'SullivanNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. People v. AbbottMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Strang v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  4. State v. TamlerOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Ballard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. People v. GrayIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State v. KristichOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  4. State v. FetterlyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Shipley v. Floydada Independent School Dist.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API