State v. . Murdock
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSchenck, J.
The defendant appellant states in her brief that “while there are several exceptions in the record, the main contention of the defendant is that there is not sufficient evidence to take the case to the jury on the felony charge.” The defendant contends that there is no evidence that she committed upon the prosecuting witness Warren an assault with intent to kill, and therefore her motion to dismiss this charge duly lodged under G. S., 15-173, should have been allowed. In fact, the exception to the refusal to sustain the demurrer to the evidence and exceptions to the charge which appear in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. Atlantic Ice & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- State v. . LandinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bowes v. BowesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. . WebbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- State v. SinclairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.