Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Chatlos v. Rowland

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 26, 1944PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.

The plaintiff Chatlos owns and operates a restaurant business in Bridgeport and in connection therewith has sold beer under a permit for the sale of alcoholic liquor, limited to beer, issued by the liquor control commission. Prior to August 31, 1942, the premises were in a Business Number 1 zone classification in which the sale of alcoholic liquor under a proper permit was not prohibited. On the date just mentioned the area in which the premises were located was reclassified and became a Business Number 3 zone. The ordinance provided that no building or premises located in such a zone should…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thayer v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. Tuohey v. MartinjakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Kelly v. DeweySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  4. Brown, State's Attorney, Ex Rel. Gray v. QuintilianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  5. Merchants Bank & Trust Co. v. PettisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McAdams v. BarbieriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  2. Clark v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  3. Salerni v. ScheuySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  4. State Ex Rel. Spiros v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
  5. Kleinsmith v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API