Legal Opinion
Karp v. Zoning Board
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 2, 1968PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCotter, J.
The intervening defendants filed an application with the zoning board of the city of Stamford to amend § 14 of the zoning regulations of the city entitled “Dispensing of Alcoholic Liquors” by adding a new subsection as follows: “H — The fifteen hundred foot restriction of this section shall not apply to removal of an existing (1) package store permit or (2) druggist permit issued by the Liquor Control Commission if the existing site or location is being taken or threatened to be taken in the exercise of eminent domain. No building or premises shall be approved in such case, however, if the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Rinaldi v. YeagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Morey v. DoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Orient Insurance v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Norvell v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Builders Service Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Carofano v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Stewart B. McKinney Foundation, Inc. v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1992
- Plourde v. LiburdiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Miller v. HeffernanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.